Left - without. Right - with.
Circular polarized. Slim size.
There is a clearly gain in contrast and color warmth.
Nikkon D5000 + 17-70mm f2.8-4 OS DC HSM
By SEN.
23 August, 2010
20 August, 2010
Why is bad: Sigma 17-70mm
1. The lens is quite soft especially on the stated aperture: f/2.8-4. It gets better from f/5.6 to f/8. But then I loose a lot of light!
2. I have problems focusing in auto, especially at 70mm and close range. The focus is haunting and gives irregular focus lock.
3. The maximum magnification is 1:2.7 and minimum focus distance is ridiculously close to the front element, making captures of shy subjects a painful job.
4. And, to make the things even worse, the lens suck dry the battery after only 250 shots, versus 500 with Nikkor 18-55mmVR!
The resulting photos are nothing stellar: so many of you may wander why I have got it! Well, It just better than standard kit lens Nikkor 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6VR, not so heavy and looks like "a million bucks " on my D5000! Awesome, dude!
By SEN.
New glass - SIGMA 17-70mm f/2.8-4 DC OS HSM
13 August, 2010
Artist in me...
The SEA
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
About me...
Look who's talking...
Sneak peak...
-
-
Fungus gnat - Lord V posted a photo: [image: Fungus gnat] Fungus gnat., Focus stacked using zerene1 week ago
-
-
Saturn and its moons (initial attempt) - ProDigi posted a photo: [image: Saturn and its moons (initial attempt)] Canon 80D. 1/30. f/8. ISO 200. Tamron 150-600mm G2 + Kenko 1.5x TC x 10x digital...6 years ago
-
-
It has been a long time - Cyrus khamak posted a photo: [image: It has been a long time] *Little Green Fly at 3X large on black:: bighugelabs.com/onblack.php?id=4259637182&size=...14 years ago
-
-
-
-
-
-